Home Site Map Contact Us


Up
Death $ Penalty

Lethal Objections

The death penalty was reinstated by the Supreme Court in 1976. From 1984 through 2000, 661 people were executed.  Let's examine the economic and social aspects of capital punishment and life in prison, and seek solutions to victims' problems.

Economic Impact

Executions are not cost-effective for taxpayers.  Executions cost much more than removing convicted persons from society for the rest of their lives. A 1993 California study concluded that each death penalty case costs at least $1.25 million more than a regular murder case and a sentence of life without possibility of parole.

Meaningful statistics are available from many government agencies and private groups.  These stats sometimes conflict with each other and use different definitions.  For this example I have generalized data from many sources.

Some assumptions:

Prisoner would live to age 65 in prison.

It costs $60,000 per year to incarcerate each prisoner.

It costs $10,000,000 per execution with appeals.

A person locked up for life at age 33 costs society $1,920,000 or $8,080,000 less than execution.

In 1999, there were almost 100 executions. The average age at arrest was 28. If it took 10 years to exhaust appeals $821,240,000 could have been saved by keeping them locked up.

Executions do not help heal victim's wounds nor do they end their pain.  Agony is prolonged during the long process between conviction and execution.  We should provide money to families of murder victims for counseling and other assistance instead of giving it to the legal system.  Governments have had to cut essential services to pay their execution bill.  We are needlessly penalizing ourselves!  See "Death $ Penalty"

Social Impact

The death penalty is a symptom, not a solution to our culture of violence. We accept the philosophy of the murderer with each execution.  What good is retribution?  Are we confusing vengeance with justice?

Good social order requires that murderers must be made unable to inflict more harm. For this reason, I propose that we substitute a "life" penalty for the traditional "death" penalty.

Life Penalty

The proposed life penalty consists of permanent confinement alone in a secure cell with only necessities to sustain life:

Dignity

Daylight

Bed

Blanket

Food

Sink

Soap

Towels

Toilet

Shorts

Shirt

Underwear

The prisoner understands that if facilities are damaged by him or her they are not repaired for one month.  Spiritual support could be available through an intercom.  A Bible, Quaran, Hindu Scripture, Book of Mormon and/or other are provided.  There is no other contact with the outside world, including family and friends.  An exception would be made if new evidence exonerates the prisoner.

The prisoner would be removed from society and could inflict no harm.

Deterrence and Presumed Guilt

Some claim that the death penalty is a deterrent.  It did not prevent the guilty now on death row from committing their crimes.  Who are we deterring?  If we think we are preventing people from committing murder we must presume their guilt for future crimes and blame the condemned for causing others to commit crimes that have not yet happened.  This is certainly not the American way.

The Solution

We must put our hard-earned tax dollars to the best use and stop trying to get even.  End the death penalty.  Let's save our money and our society.

That's my opinion - What's yours?

 -- David Jackson


 
We can go home God gives thanks? Was Scrooge right? It's a short month You can't beat a woman Ultimate Abuse Compute a Cure Lethal Objections Last Drop
 

Useful Links

Death Cost Penalty

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back Home Up Next